Jina Wu
Let’s talk
Avitas Systems, a Baker Hughes & GE venture · Industrial inspection platform

Rebuilding an inspection platform with AI

Avitas started as a GE venture, later acquired by Baker Hughes, with a big goal: use drones, robotics, and AI to make industrial inspections safer and faster across oil & gas, power, and energy.

I was the solo designer for the first 1.5 years. The product had been built by engineers and product, and inspectors struggled to use it. I defined the high-level flows, aligned the team on goals, and shaped it into one consistent, scalable platform. Instead of spending long hours building custom demos for every customer, the team could now focus on one unified product that powered every demo too. Along the way, sales prospects grew 35%.

Outcome One platform now served every industry, so the team stopped building separate demos for each customer. A CSS-driven system kept it consistent and fast to update.
Timeline
Aug 2017 – Jul 20181 year
Role
Senior Staff UX designer
Team
0.5x UX teammate 2x Executives 6x PMs 4x Data scientists 20x Backend + frontend dev 2x Customer groups
Impact
Faster development with one shared systemSales prospects up 35%

Problem: Fragmented workflow, inconsistent design, poor usability, lack of essential capabilities

Inspectors faced a frustrating workflow, repeatedly re-entering and searching asset data across Dashboard, Inspection, and Report features. The platform lacked essential tools like search, filtering, and contextual insights, resulting in a disjointed, inconsistent experience. For industries needing continuous monitoring, this made extracting insights and taking action inefficient.

Custom dashboard
Asset inspector page
Inspection detail page
OpportunityBuild one unified inspection system where context persists across three core workflows (dashboard, inspection details, and reporting) so inspectors can search once, see clearly, and report confidently without switching tools or losing where they are.

Discovery

Stakeholder interviews

When I started, the six PMs weren’t really talking to each other. Each managed a different industry and set of customers, so everyone saw only their slice of the product. I interviewed them one by one to piece together the bigger picture: what the platform was for, who it was really serving, and how each feature connected to the others.

Using this feedback, I created a concept map that aligned business goals at the company level, defined target personas, and visualized how existing features and workflows were interconnected.

Customer interviews and site visit

During site visits, I spoke with subsea and land inspectors to understand their workflow, needs, and pain points. Here’s what I found:

Frustrating reportingReports are slow, manual, and lack a way to view historical data easily.
Critical offline modeSubsea inspectors often have no connectivity. They need all relevant information downloaded and accessible offline.
Fast asset identification & alertsBoth teams need quick access to asset details and early-issue detection to prevent critical failures.

Journey map

I turned what I learned into a journey map of the full inspection, from setting up an asset to the follow-up visit. For every need along the way, I checked it against the roadmap: already built, missing from the MVP, or beyond the short-term plan. Shared with customers and the team, the map became how we agreed on priorities and what to build next.

01Pre-inspectionProgram manager · Inspector · Pilot
02Initial inspectionPilot · Inspector
03Post-inspectionCustomer · Repair engineer
04Follow-up inspectionInspector · Pilot
Every need, sorted against the roadmap
In the MVPAlready built and working
Missing from the MVPGaps to close in the short term
Beyond the MVPLonger-term opportunities

Explorations: Initial concepts

After the initial design exploration and workshop, my design colleague joined the team, and we worked together, splitting up features to refine and improve each key area.

Inspector report
Inspector report
Inspector concept map
Inspector asset map
Dashboard asset details expanded
Dashboard asset details expanded
IA & nav expanded
IA & nav expanded
Search and filter
Search and filter
Inspection by date
Inspection by date
Inspection list view
Inspection list view
Inspection image view
Inspection image view
Inspection details
Inspection details

Workshop: Walking the team through concepts

We brought the team together to walk through concepts and test feasibility. Quick feedback loops let us align, secure buy-in, and refine designs on the spot.

Final design

Design components & specification

My design partner and I built a design system and component library.

Prototype

Final Avitas dashboard with map of inspection sites

Impact: Transforming the platform with scalable design

The redesigned platform helped inspectors spend more time on actual inspection work and less on searching for information. Unified design across oil & gas, power, and renewable energy created a foundation strong enough to scale, reducing internal effort and letting customers adapt the platform to their unique needs.

100%Positive feedback from internal teams and customers
35%Increase in sales prospects
Fully CSS-driven UIConsistent, fast to update, and better performing
Scalable across industriesOne platform for oil & gas, power, and energy
Unified teamClear direction everyone could build toward
No more custom demo buildsNo late nights or weekends spent on one-off demos

Takeaways

Constraints: limited design resources, and a platform built from the ground up.

Be adaptableAs the only designer supporting PMs across industries, I balanced tight POC timelines with building a scalable platform. It taught me to be proactive and flexible.
Research beyond the product teamPMs were domain experts, but a scalable solution needs diverse perspectives. Research is what truly uncovers pain points and opportunities.
Bring everyone on the journeyCross-collaboration is key. Without digging into real problems, even the best design proposal is meaningless if it doesn’t help users.